Good Programming Practices in Clinical Trials Programming (SAS & R)
- IDDCR Global Team
- Jul 12
- 3 min read
Ensuring Accuracy, Compliance, and Efficiency in Clinical Data Programming
In the highly regulated and quality-sensitive world of clinical research, programming plays a pivotal role in transforming raw data into meaningful statistical outputs for regulatory submissions, safety reviews, and scientific publications. Whether you're using SAS—the gold standard in clinical trials—or R, the emerging open-source powerhouse, good programming practices are critical to ensuring compliance, traceability, and reproducibility.
This article explores key principles and best practices in clinical trials programming, with a focus on SAS and R, tailored to professionals involved in clinical data management, statistical programming, and biostatistics.

Why Good Programming Practice Matters in Clinical Trials
Unlike general-purpose programming, clinical trial programming must satisfy:
Regulatory requirements (e.g., FDA, EMA, PMDA)
Clinical data standards (e.g., CDISC – SDTM, ADaM)
Validation and audit readiness
End-user clarity and reproducibility
Poor practices can result in misleading analyses, regulatory rejections, and compliance breaches, leading to costly delays or data integrity issues.
“Write code for others to read, not just for machines to execute.”
Key Principles of Good Programming Practice
1. Clarity and Readability
Use meaningful variable and macro names (e.g., trt_start_date vs. a1)
Maintain consistent indentation and alignment
Break down large programs into modular sections or macros
Add clear and concise comments explaining logic, assumptions, and purpose
2. Structured Program Layout
Typical structure of a clinical trial program:
Header Section: Author, purpose, date, protocol ID
Input Section: Dataset paths, libraries, parameters
Processing Section: Data cleaning, transformations, derivations
Output Section: Datasets, tables, listings, figures (TLFs)
Footer Section: Logs, notes, exit code
3. Validation and Reproducibility
Use double programming or independent reviewer validation
Write testable code with intermediate checks and log messages
Save output logs and version control scripts
4. Modular and Reusable Code
Store macros/functions centrally to ensure consistency
Create template programs for standard outputs like AE listings, demographic tables
Avoid hardcoding; use macro variables or parameters to make code flexible
5. Standardization (CDISC, ADaM, SDTM)
Follow CDISC-compliant programming for SDTM and ADaM datasets
Use controlled terminology (e.g., MedDRA, WHODrug)
Validate datasets using Pinnacle 21 (P21) or OpenCDISC validator
SAS-Specific Best Practices
SAS has long been the preferred tool for regulatory submissions. Some key practices include:
Use PROC SQL for complex joins and merges with traceability
Leverage DATA steps for sequential logic and transformation
Utilize SAS macros for automating repetitive tasks (e.g., creating similar TLFs)
Validate log files for warnings, errors, and uninitialized variables
Prefer libname references over hardcoded file paths for portability
SAS Example:
%let trtgrp = TRT01P;
data adsl;
set sdtm.dm;
where safety_flag = 'Y';
trt_group = &trtgrp;
run;
R Programming Best Practices in Clinical Trials
R is increasingly used in exploratory analysis, visualization, and even production reporting. Best practices include:
Use tidyverse packages (dplyr, ggplot2, readr, etc.) for clean, readable code
Document your scripts using Roxygen2 for reproducible functions
Use projects and environments (renv, packrat) for version control
Adopt rmarkdown or Quarto for dynamic reporting of TLFs
Validate code and outputs using unit testing (testthat) or peer review
R Example:
library(dplyr)
adsl <- dm %>%
filter(SAFETY_FLAG == "Y") %>%
mutate(TRT_GROUP = TRT01P)
Programming Compliance and Audit Readiness
Clinical programming outputs are subject to inspection by regulatory agencies. Ensure:
Traceability from source data to outputs (annotated shells help)
Program documentation including metadata and specifications
Logs and results are archived and version-controlled
Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 for electronic records
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Hardcoding treatment arms or subject IDs
Ignoring missing values handling
Not saving intermediate datasets for traceability
Re-using old programs without adapting to current specs
Not checking the SAS log or R console for warnings/errors
Building Long-Term Programming Excellence
To sustain and grow as a clinical trial programmer:
Stay updated with industry standards (CDISC, ICH, regulatory updates)
Attend workshops, conferences, and online learning programs
Join professional networks like PHUSE, ASA, R Consortium, or CDISC
Document your code for team knowledge sharing and audit readiness
Learn both SAS and R to stay flexible and relevant
Conclusion
Good programming practice is not just about writing code—it’s about writing reliable, readable, and regulatory-compliant code that ensures data integrity, supports scientific validity, and accelerates drug development timelines. Whether you're using SAS for regulatory submissions or R for advanced analytics, mastering these principles will elevate your value as a clinical research professional.
Comments